🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate atomic negotiations with Washington provided that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said solely negotiations was effective, and shared recent overtures had been made by intermediaries to reopen talks with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Route

The foreign minister is walking a challenging course since Iran does not want be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was speaking at a security conference in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of talks between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a two-week conflict that ended with the American leader declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Subsequently, EU nations employed their right to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Iranian officials said they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's enrichment initiative was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could work inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with the US representative the American negotiator only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations resume.

The US president last week stated he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving clear proposals from Washington either straightforwardly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Position

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the idea of international law, Araghchi declared the two-week conflict showed the clash could not be ended by military means. He stated the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making trust hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Answer

The foreign minister said: "It was not Iran that had abandoned negotiations; it was America and the Western nations that had always sought to enforce their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the final solution to address conflicts, but its requirements, rules and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the identical approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Tehran representatives as the struggle of repair and recovery, Araghchi claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have identified our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He stated: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is important is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to shatter. The Iranian people have grown stronger, more cohesive, and more backing of the government and the state in the face of this assault."