🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear Ruben Amorim endured defeat by lower-league opposition. Survive an important European final versus one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, Amorim took on the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most casual observer will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this entire bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. It may have been tempting, given his brief stint in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge within the club's structure: a man whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind that the club's mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Conflict Over Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, this was the director , after having been part of the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – function at a level exceeding our mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has made very clear his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting early in his minority ownership, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be determined by this group”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and yachting. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Whom else could one trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The Modern Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier of the game. Historically, teams mistakenly delegated big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to go into a club and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their methods to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not really creating the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered cold or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea takes a squad of literal children into the Champions League and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy sees his standing damaged while those individuals who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Modern Corporate Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And possibly on some microcosmic level this is simply neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded elite who can never be wrong, whose choices remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Hire the system coach only to fire him for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and then bin them for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – remain in control.